**Just like companies traded on the stock market, income-producing real estate properties can be valued based on the discounted value of their future expected cash flows.** This is known as the **discounted cash flow (DCF) method** of valuation. The method entails first inflating future operating values based on growth assumptions (e.g., lease escalation schedules, operating expense inflation), followed by the discounting of both future estimated net operating and net sale cash flows to a present value based on the transaction’s risk profile.

The **discount rate** you select to contract the size of the future cash flow amounts should represent the opportunity cost percentage return that a similarly-risky investment alternative would provide you. Choice of discount rate is highly subjective, and there is no verifiable “right” rate to choose, unfortunately. More on discount rate selection can be found here.

An example of DCF-based property valuation follows.

Let’s assume for simplicity that we purchase a property in all-cash for $100MM at a 6.2% going-in cap rate ($6.2MM/$100MM), there are no acquisition transaction costs, no capital costs below the NOI line, and that we sell at the end of Year 4 for $110MM.

The nominal **net levered cash flow** amount (pre-income tax profit) of $35,938,487 (circled in **green** below) reflects the growth assumptions and expense inflation, but if we regard this as the net “value created” by the four-year long transaction, it would suggest we have **100% confidence** in all of the projected values ending up being what we forecasted them to be.

But the reality is that we can’t knowingly tell a true story about the future any more than the next person can, so if we are honest with ourselves, we admit the **we don’t have 100% confidence** in the expected values coming to pass as shown on the spreadsheet. As a result, we discount all values (other than the Time 0 value) **on a compounded basis** at the assumed annual discount rate. We note that some will choose a relatively lower rate for the early years and a relatively higher rate for the late years, but we will assume a constant rate because it all averages out to a constant rate at the end of the day. In the example below, we are using a 7% annual discount rate.

As shown circled in yellow above, we take the the nominal expected values in years 1 through 4 and discount them the appropriate number of times. The basic math behind this (which underlies the Present Value, or PV function in Excel) is:

**future value / (1+ annual discount rate)^(# of years of discounting)**

where the ^ represents the exponent operator. An example of this is the Year 2 expected value of $6,386,000 discounting down to $5,577,780 based on this math: $6,386,000/(1.07)^(2).

Now, as shown below circled in yellow, if we sum the **discounted** values of the expected values, we see that they total $105,828,455. If we were to have added the **nominal** (undiscounted) expected values without discounting them, then the total would have been the $100MM paid at time zero plus the $35,938,487 net levered cash flow amount, for a total of $135,938,487. So the discounting activity has resulted in a reduction of the total perceived value of the property by approximately $30MM (the difference between $135,938,487 without discounting and $105,828,455 with discounting).

So standing here today, we perceive the property’s** present value, to us**, based on our own projections of future cash flows and our own discount rate — i.e., its worth — is $105,828,455. Now it’s up to us to decided if the Net Present Value (NPV) (circled in **green** above) of $5.8MM, which results from our anticipated $100MM purchase price amount being deducted from the $105,828,455 present value is attractive enough to us, and whether we should reduce our pricing to increase the NPV further.

Variances in future projection values, discount rates and going-in cap rate requirements across a pool of buyers is what makes bids on properties come in at different values. The spread of the bids will depend on just how widely these amounts and requirements vary.